{"id":3836,"date":"2016-04-10T14:29:31","date_gmt":"2016-04-10T13:29:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/t-machine.org\/?p=3836"},"modified":"2016-04-10T14:29:31","modified_gmt":"2016-04-10T13:29:31","slug":"office-suites-word-excel-apple-google-in-2016-power-user-experience","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/new.t-machine.org\/index.php\/2016\/04\/10\/office-suites-word-excel-apple-google-in-2016-power-user-experience\/","title":{"rendered":"Office suites (Word, Excel, Apple, Google) in 2016: Power-user experience"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Every week, I have to use six different Office Software Suites:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>At school: Microsoft Office 2013\n<li>At university: Microsoft Office 365\n<li>At work: OpenOffice\n<li>At home: LibreOffice\n<li>Everywhere: Apple Keynote\n<li>Everywhere: Google Docs\n<\/ol>\n<p>As an expert computer user (former SysAdmin), I&#8217;m often asked for help by people with non-computing backgrounds. When they see how many different suites I&#8217;m using, they&#8217;re &#8230; surprised, to say the least. Here&#8217;s a quick snapshot of what and why.<br \/>\n<!--more--><\/p>\n<h2>My history<\/h2>\n<p>I&#8217;ve been using Office since Excel version 2.0 (which ran from the command-line).<\/p>\n<p>In the late 1990&#8217;s, I worked as a temp secretary, and saw a lot of offices at different companies. Office 95 was the last serious improvement we saw in Microsoft&#8217;s software. Everything since then has added features of dubious value. Microsoft had to justify regular $500 upgrade fees per person. It wasn&#8217;t until 2000&#8217;s that StarOffice\/OpenOffice made significant inroads in giving businesses a viable, cheap\/free, alternative.<\/p>\n<h2>Operating System<\/h2>\n<p>No matter what Microsoft marketing tells you, there has never been a fully-working, up-to-date version of Microsoft Office for Apple computers. Is this Microsoft&#8217;s fault? Apple&#8217;s? Both &#8211; probably. If you have Macs anywhere in your business, you cannot afford to go Microsoft-only.<\/p>\n<h2>Office 2013 for Windows<\/h2>\n<p>I hate having to teach lessons where children fall to pieces trying to use the absurdly badly-designed UI and UX.<\/p>\n<p>I hate being asked &#8220;but WHY is that button not where it should be?&#8221;, &#8220;WHY can&#8217;t I click over here, when normally I can?&#8221; &#8230; because usually the only true answer is &#8220;because a Manager at Microsoft had to justify their salary by moving it from where you expected, and there was nowhere good for it to go&#8221;. With older children, you can give them some honesty; the younger ones lack the ability to deal with such nuance.<\/p>\n<p>But UK schools have been forced into a very bad contract with Microsoft, thanks to some very bad decisions by successive UK goverments (both Labout and Conservative). The docs are public &#8211; Microsoft effectively extorts tens of millions of dollars a year from UK schools and teachers, to no net benefit.<\/p>\n<p>(if Bill Gates really wanted to improve education, he could start by cancelling Microsoft&#8217;s immoral long-term contracts with schools)<\/p>\n<h2>OpenOffice<\/h2>\n<p>Free, open-source. Politically neutral, not owned by any major American company with selfish aims.<\/p>\n<p>On Mac, this is the most reliable, least buggy, fastest implementation of Office.<\/p>\n<p>It is MUCH faster than Microsoft&#8217;s official (latest tested with Office 2013 last year, extensively). It is also MUCH less buggy &#8211; frequently opening and fixing files that were authored in Office 2013, and Office 2013 then corrupted and could no longer open!<\/p>\n<p>However, many of the lead authors jumped-ship to LibreOffice, and maintenance + feature improvements lag behind LO.<\/p>\n<h2>LibreOffice<\/h2>\n<p>Free, open-source. In theory, has every feature of OpenOffice &#8211; started from same source code.<\/p>\n<p>In practice, on Mac: more buggy, with much worse UX (many icons that in OO are very clear have become absurd abstract monstrosities in LO. First rule &#8211; &#8220;User must be able to understand icon at a glance&#8221; &#8211; often fails).<\/p>\n<p>HOWEVER: has MUCH better support for opening the files created by latest Microsoft versions. Microsoft keeps adding features and non-backwards-compatible bits. OO doesn&#8217;t (can&#8217;t?) keep up, but LO does.<\/p>\n<p>Sadly: &#8220;better&#8221; does not always mean &#8220;good enough&#8221;. E.g. 2015\/2016 versions: if you edit a Word .docx in LO, and check the printing setup, then open in Word &#8230; the printing and layout is usually wrong by 10-20%. This makes your 1 page document 1-and-a-bit pages. Your 2-side document is now 2.3 sides &#8230; stuff like this is a signifcant problem for doc-sharing.<\/p>\n<h2>Office 365<\/h2>\n<p>Office 365 is Microsoft&#8217;s panic-move because Google Docs was destroying them in the market.<\/p>\n<p>I have to use it because many UK schools and Universities have been seduced into adopting it, for &#8220;free or almost free&#8221; (trouble lurks behind that word &#8220;almost&#8221;).<\/p>\n<p>It sucks &#8211; not because its badly written; I suspect it&#8217;s extremely well written, but the original idea was absurd. Don&#8217;t use it for anything if you can avoid it &#8211; unlike Google Docs, its very slow and buggy. I suspect because it tries to implement <em>every single feature of old Microsoft Office<\/em> in the web browser &#8211; and that&#8217;s a lot of code, much of it outdated and slow.<\/p>\n<h2>Keynote<\/h2>\n<p>Keynote is Apple&#8217;s presentation software. PowerPoint 2016 is getting close in some areas, but my laptop is running the 10-years-ago version of Keynote, and Powerpoint hasn&#8217;t caught up yet!<\/p>\n<p>Any presentation I write &#8211; even when it has to be delivered on PowerPoint on a Windows machine &#8211; is significantly faster to write in Keynote, export to PowerPoint, open in PowerPoint, fix up incompatibilities &#8230; than to write in PowerPoint.<\/p>\n<p>(NB: I&#8217;ve been using PowerPoint for almost 20 years, and Keynote for a little over 10 years; I am fairly productive in both. But keynote wins time and again &#8211; better UX!)<\/p>\n<h2>Google Docs<\/h2>\n<p>Originally free, then free and paid, and now &#8230; who knows?<\/p>\n<p>Google keeps making scary noises here &#8211; e.g. Google Docs officially no longer exists; we&#8217;re supposed to say &#8220;Google Drive&#8221; (because Drive is unpopular, and Google Marketing is trying to prop it up). How long will Docs live on?<\/p>\n<p>Most companies and schools I see mostly use just one part of Docs: the spreadsheets. Faster than any online Excel, and much more user-friendly, with live editing by multiple people. Excellent!<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s missing many of Excel&#8217;s features &#8211; most of the advanced stuff &#8211; so it is no replacement for some. But for most people, doing ordinary work, it&#8217;s &#8220;what you need and no more&#8221;.<\/p>\n<h2>Conclusion<\/h2>\n<p>The era of monolithic Office Suite software is clearly over; we&#8217;re mixing-and-matching based on use-case.<\/p>\n<p>From memory, the era never truly existed &#8211; it was conceived as a marketing\/sales scam to lock-in businesses to one proprietary platform (difficult to do, but smart; Microsoft deserved to make billions out of that). It&#8217;s taken a decade or two to undo the damage that Microsoft did to the world of people who use computers to do &#8220;work&#8221;, but we&#8217;re there.<\/p>\n<p>So &#8230; don&#8217;t be afraid to mix and match. Do learn what the lowest common multiple is for each file-format &#8211; for instance, an Office 95 doc can be opened by anything, anywhere, usually with zero corruption and bugs, whereas a docx is much less global. A .CSV file is universal, suppored not just by software, but understood by webservers and apps, but a .xlsx is not.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Every week, I have to use six different Office Software Suites: At school: Microsoft Office 2013 At university: Microsoft Office 365 At work: OpenOffice At home: LibreOffice Everywhere: Apple Keynote Everywhere: Google Docs As an expert computer user (former SysAdmin), I&#8217;m often asked for help by people with non-computing backgrounds. When they see how many [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[56,30,62,46],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/new.t-machine.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3836"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/new.t-machine.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/new.t-machine.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/new.t-machine.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/new.t-machine.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3836"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/new.t-machine.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3836\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3837,"href":"http:\/\/new.t-machine.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3836\/revisions\/3837"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/new.t-machine.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3836"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/new.t-machine.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3836"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/new.t-machine.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3836"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}